Posted by: Puma1 | December 30, 2008

Why Does Rachel Maddow Hate Israel?

Far left wing Clinton-hater Rachel Maddow is busy trashing Israel from her perch at MSNBC:

Maddow: “But while we’re on the wild wide world of scary tour, of course, Israel has started another war. A third straight day of air-strikes on Gaza, the death toll now more than 300 people. Israel says they are doing this to prevent Palestinians from firing rockets into southern Israel. First of all, there’s the question of proportionality as to how many people those rockets have killed versus how many people the Israeli bombing has now killed. There’s also the issue of effectiveness. In the midst of this massive air assault killing hundreds of civilians in Gaza, a rocket fired from Gaza today killed a man and wounded seven in the Israeli town of Ashkelon. Effectiveness. Three Israelis were also stabbed by a Palestinian in a Jewish settlement in the West Bank today. Is there a military solution to this problem?”

Okay, now, whatever your opinion of the indefatigable Jew-Arab cum Israel-Palestine kerfuffle, it is clear that Israel did not “start” this war (this time). Everybody who has been paying attention — and once again the so-called journalists at MSNBC haven’t been (shocker) — knows that this conflict started with Hamas’s needlessly provocative breach of a cease fire by launching rockets into Israel. Hell, even dyed-in-the-wool liberal rags like The Nation are aware of these simple facts — and growing tired of the shenanigans.

Maddow, along with hacks like Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews, are the reason why MSNBC’s personalities are now laughingstocks.

But, please, carry on, my biased sons. Nothing would please me more than to see MSNBC’s already flagging brand further flushed down the crapper.


  1. Challenge, can anyone prove this wrong?:–

    1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”.

    2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.

    3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) — as confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution agreed to by BHO.

    4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 — between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) — to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.

    5. Since no facts are in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.

    6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.

    7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined — the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.

  2. Proportionality? What is that crazy broad talking about? The whole idea is make sure they won’t do it again. Tit for tat won’t work.

    How is she still on the air?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: